It ensures:
- Documents can be raised in transaction currency
- Amounts are converted to base currency consistently
- Realised and unrealised FX differences are captured correctly
- Foreign-currency bank and control accounts reconcile reliably
Core concepts
- Base (functional) currency: the entity’s primary reporting currency
- Transaction currency: the currency of an invoice, bill, or payment
- Unrealised FX: FX movement on open items revalued at period end
- Realised FX: FX difference when an item is settled at a different rate
Example: Unrealised, then realised FX
Base currency: EUR
Supplier bill: $5,000
- Bill recorded:
- Bill date rate: 1 USD = €0.90 → payable recorded at €4,500
- Month-end revaluation (bill unpaid):
- Closing rate: 1 USD = €0.92 → payable should be €4,600
- Unrealised FX loss = €100
- Settlement next month:
- Payment rate: 1 USD = €0.91 → payment equals €4,550
- Payable was sitting at €4,600 after revaluation
- Realised FX gain on settlement = €50
Why it matters
Multi-currency accounting improves:
- Accuracy of profit and balance sheet in multi-currency trading
- Reconciliation quality for FX bank accounts and payables/receivables
- Visibility of FX exposure (so it doesn’t hide in margin noise)
- Close speed by reducing spreadsheet-based FX workarounds
- Do we need multi-currency accounting for low FX volume?
Often yes—FX mismatches can still cause reconciliation issues and inaccurate profit if rates are inconsistent. - Where do FX gains and losses appear?
Typically in the income statement as FX gain/loss, sometimes split by realised/unrealised depending on reporting preference. - What’s the most common mistake?
Inconsistent rate usage and failing to revalue open monetary balances at period end.